Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €96.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a durability of 5.73 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX
