Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €98.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a durability of 5.73 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
