Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs, while Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.8:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Shimano Aero 4000X
