Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT
Spinning
83.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight145g / 5.11oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €471.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX edges out Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (145g / 5,11oz) and the durability (9.5 out of 10). Still, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs and a line retrieve per crank of 68 centimeter / 26.77 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT?
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a retrieve score of 5.43 out of 10 (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX
- The 5.67 out of 10 (4.9:1) gear ratio gives you the power you need to handle heavy lures and strong large fish out of cover
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9.03 out of 10 (145g / 5,11oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX
