Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €479.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X clearly outshines Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000, offering significantly better performance in weight (185g / 6,53oz) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT?
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.77 out of 10 (185g / 6,53oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X
