Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
70.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight315g / 11.11oz
Line retireve per crank92 centimeter / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €99.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.43/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a total score of 7.38 out of 10, while Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX
