Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.97 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €48.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeLT1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 edges out Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs) and the durability (5.73 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 205g / 7,23oz and a gear ratio of 5.2:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 23 NINJA LT?
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a retrieve score of 5.43 out of 10 (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX
