Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT
Spinning
69.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeLT3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a durability of 5.73 out of 10, while Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 23 NINJA LT?
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX
