Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
Multireels
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.58:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight800g / 28219oz
Line retireve per crank55 centimeter / 21654 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/500
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) edges out Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the durability (9.5 out of 10). Still, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 68 centimeter / 26.77 inch and a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)?
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a retrieve score of 5.43 out of 10 (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
- For a score of 5.18 out of 10 (3.58:1) in gear ratio, the reel leans towards power over speed, making it handy when you need that extra muscle during tough fights
- With a high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (8), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX
