Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD-DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX edges out Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (300g / 10,58oz) and the gear ratio (4.8:1). Still, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 holds its own with strengths like a durability of 5.73 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.29 out of 10 (300g / 10,58oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX
