Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa Freams LT
Spinning
73.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag-
Weight330g / 11.64oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €120.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.43/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs, while Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.7:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa Freams LT?
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a serious drag score of 9.2 out of 10 (15kg / 33,07lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9 out of 10 (5.7:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
