Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000

Multireels

73.80 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.73 out of 10

Ergonomics3.8 out of 10

Gear ratio3.2:1

Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs

Weight1230g / 43.39oz

Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch

Ball bearings3

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelMultireels
Price range~ €622.90
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size-
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeStar drag
Handle orientationRight
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa TD FEEDER QD

Feeder And Match

61.30 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classMedium

Durability3.72 out of 10

Ergonomics3.8 out of 10

Gear ratio4.9:1

Maximum drag8kg

Weight440g / 15.52oz

Line retireve per crank87 centimeter

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelFeeder and match
Price range~ €95.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4012
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.29/150

Conclusion

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 edges out Daiwa TD FEEDER QD with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.73 out of 10) and the total score (7.38 out of 10). Still, Daiwa TD FEEDER QD holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a gear ratio of 4.9:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa TD FEEDER QD?

Daiwa TD FEEDER QD

The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (6) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers