Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
34.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight346g / 12.2oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/350
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs) and line retrieve per crank (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch). While Delphin BRONZ 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Delphin BRONZ?
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a serious drag score of 9.2 out of 10 (15kg / 33,07lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
- With a retrieve score of 5.43 out of 10 (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Delphin BRONZ 6000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX
