Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Delphin HORNET 50X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.62 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight360g / 12oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €26.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/400
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 50X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs) and line retrieve per crank (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch). While Delphin HORNET 50X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Delphin HORNET?
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a serious drag score of 9.2 out of 10 (15kg / 33,07lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
- With a retrieve score of 5.43 out of 10 (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Delphin HORNET 50X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X
