Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Delphin REDIX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Delphin REDIX
Feeder And Match
41.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.83 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight440g / 15oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €39.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/605
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 clearly outshines Delphin REDIX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs) and line retrieve per crank (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch). While Delphin REDIX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Delphin REDIX?
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a serious drag score of 9.2 out of 10 (15kg / 33,07lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
- With a retrieve score of 5.43 out of 10 (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Delphin REDIX
- This reel ensures a smooth and efficient retrieve, great for consistent casting and control in feeder and match fishing
- With a ball bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
