Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Mitchell MX2 Spinning
Spinning
3000x
63.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.14 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag7.4kg / 16,31lbs
Weight258g / 9.1oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandMITCHELL
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.31/125
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs, while Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Mitchell MX2 Spinning?
Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.28 out of 10 (258g / 9,1oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
