Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Penn Battle III 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Penn Battle III
Spinning
72.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.73 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight330g / 11.64oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €96.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/180
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Penn Battle III 3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs, while Penn Battle III 3000X stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Penn Battle III?
Penn Battle III 3000X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX
