Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Penn Battle III 6000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Penn Battle III
Spinning
67.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.81 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight590g / 20.81oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €113.30
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/310
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Penn Battle III 6000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs, while Penn Battle III 6000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.6:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Penn Battle III?
Penn Battle III 6000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX
