Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Penn Battle III 8000 HSX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a line retrieve per crank of 68 centimeter / 26.77 inch, while Penn Battle III 8000 HSX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Penn Battle III?
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a retrieve score of 5.43 out of 10 (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX
