Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Penn Sargus II Spinning
Spinning
2500x
64.80 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a durability of 5.73 out of 10, while Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.5:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Penn Sargus II Spinning?
Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.6 out of 10 (5.5:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.11 out of 10 (284g / 10,02oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX
