Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €114.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano AERO XR C3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a durability of 5.73 out of 10, while Shimano AERO XR C3000X stands out for a weight of 210g / 7,41oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano AERO XR C3000X
- This reel ensures a smooth and efficient retrieve, great for consistent casting and control in feeder and match fishing
- Rated 8.8 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
