Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano AERO XR C5000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a durability of 5.73 out of 10, while Shimano AERO XR C5000X stands out for a ball bearings of 5+1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano AERO XR C5000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.57 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
