Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs, while Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX stands out for a weight of 155g / 5,47oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Cardiff XR?
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a retrieve score of 5.43 out of 10 (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.97 out of 10 (155g / 5,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX
