Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
49.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs) and durability (5.73 out of 10). While Shimano Catana FE 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Catana FE?
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a retrieve score of 5.43 out of 10 (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Shimano Catana FE 1000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
