Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
49.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs) and durability (5.73 out of 10). While Shimano Catana FE 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Catana FE?
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a retrieve score of 5.43 out of 10 (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Shimano Catana FE 1000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X
