Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
51.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 2500X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs) and durability (5.73 out of 10). While Shimano Catana FE 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Catana FE?
Shimano Catana FE 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX
