Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
63.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a durability of 5.73 out of 10, while Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Catana FE?
Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A
