Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
53.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE C 3000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (5.73 out of 10) and maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs). While Shimano Catana FE C 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Catana FE?
Shimano Catana FE C 3000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL
