Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Shimano Exsence
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €416.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 MHGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/125
Conclusion
Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX clearly outshines Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.0:1) and weight (180g / 6,35oz). While Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Exsence?
Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.6 out of 10 (6.0:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
