Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
57.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 edges out Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs) and the total score (7.38 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 205g / 7,23oz and a ball bearings of 4+1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a retrieve score of 5.43 out of 10 (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX
