Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a total score of 7.38 out of 10, while Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X stands out for a weight of 240g / 8,47oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX
