Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Shimano Sedona FJ 500
Spinning
500x
60.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/110
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 edges out Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch). Still, Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.6:1 and a weight of 170g / 6oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Sedona FJ 500?
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a retrieve score of 5.43 out of 10 (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A
