Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
55.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 edges out Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs) and the total score (7.38 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 215g / 7,58oz and a ball bearings of 3+1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a retrieve score of 5.43 out of 10 (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX
