Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a total score of 7.38 out of 10, while Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX stands out for a weight of 240g / 8,47oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
