Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a total score of 7.38 out of 10, while Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX stands out for a weight of 245g / 8,64oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX
