Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
74.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000HGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs, while Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX
