Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs, while Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X stands out for a weight of 190g / 6,7oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a retrieve score of 5.43 out of 10 (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.73 out of 10 (190g / 6,7oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX
