Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
77.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000SFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs, while Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX stands out for a weight of 175g / 6,17oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a retrieve score of 5.43 out of 10 (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX
