Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
76.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs, while Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX stands out for a weight of 180g / 6,35oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Ultegra?
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a retrieve score of 5.43 out of 10 (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X
