Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
85.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2500SHGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX edges out Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.1:1) and the weight (180g / 6,35oz). Still, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Ultegra?
Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.8 out of 10 (6.1:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX
