Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
92.50 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000HGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX edges out Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.8:1) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Ultegra?
Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX
