Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs, while Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Ultegra?
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
