Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
Spinning
52.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank73cm / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 SFI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.16mm-150m / 0.18mm-120m / 0.20mm-95m
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 clearly outshines Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs) and durability (5.73 out of 10). While Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI?
Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8.64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX
