Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
Spinning
58.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.97 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61oz
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79cm / 31.10 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €48.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000 HGS
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.14mm-145m / 0.16mm-105m/0.18mm-80m
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 edges out Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs) and the durability (5.73 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 6.0:1 and a weight of 215g / 7.58oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI?
Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
- A fast gear ratio of 9.6 out of 10 (6.0:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7.58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X
