Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Multireels
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag19kg / 41.89 lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank111/41 cm - 43.70/16.14 inch
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €337.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 50/700. 80/440
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a line retrieve per crank of 68 centimeter / 26.77 inch, while Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS?
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a retrieve score of 5.43 out of 10 (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
- A gear ratio of 4.0:1/1.5:1 (scoring 6.11 out of 10) gives you a nice middle ground, just enough torque to handle pressure, but still quick enough for general use
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4 ARB), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX
