Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Exsence
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €421.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 MXGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/110

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Exsence and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX
