Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

Shimano Exsence
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €416.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 MHGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/125

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Exsence and Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF?
Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX
