Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Exsence
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €416.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 MHGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/125

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX and Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX offers a weight of 180g / 6,35oz, while Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD stands out for a ball bearings of 4. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Exsence and Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD?
Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X
