Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Exsence
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €416.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 MHGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/125

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT
Feeder And Match
59.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.62 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight380g / 13.4oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €74.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 SS-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX clearly outshines Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (180g / 6,35oz). While Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Exsence and Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT?
Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
