Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Delphin INKS 4000X

Shimano Exsence
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €416.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 MHGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/125

Delphin INKS
Spinning
56.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/470
Conclusion
Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). While Delphin INKS 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Exsence and Delphin INKS?
Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.3 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin INKS 4000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX
