Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X

Shimano Exsence
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €416.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 MHGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/125

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/210
Conclusion
Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Exsence and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.3 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX
